Content
Questions
Doctor of Social Leadership
Program
Karen Blair
Omega Graduate School
April 10, 2025
Topic: Self Efficacy
1.
Content Questions
Self -Efficacy
Introduction
The (Cambridge dictionary, 2019) states that " Self-Efficacy is a person's belief that they can be
successful when carrying out a particular task." Therefore, the perception surrounding self-
efficacy is primarily in reference to individual's beliefs in regards to being capable of
demonstrating authority over their goals and aspirations. Ultimately, believers in Christ are
motivated by the Word of Almighty YAH and they develop a daily mindset that they "Can do all
things through Christ that strengthens them. "According to (APA.ORG, 2009) “Self-efficacy
refers to an individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce
specific performance attainments.” (Bandura, 1977, 1986, 1997) This concept is considered a
very important and fundamental criteria for motivating an individual towards maximizing their
natural and spiritual desire to succeed in life. However, the self–efficacy approach tends to varies
from among individuals and that is primarily based on the situation or circumstances that avail
itself or the environment constraint. It is also considered a primary factor that motives a person’s
desire to learn and achieve positive outcome in goal establishment and achieving academical
success. Thus, it is justifiable to say that the holy scriptures are the primary and fundamental
principles that promote the idea of 'Self-Efficacy' in the life of a believer.
Keywords: Self Efficacy, beliefs, Motivation, Capability, Positive,
Academics.
2.
Content Questions
Self -Efficacy
Review of the Literatures
The Theory of Self-Efficacy currently plays a very significant role in both the research of clinical
practices and education. For example, in the area of health psychology the practices of self-
efficacy have been made applicable to a diversified area of behavioral practices. (Carey, M. P., &
Forsyth, A. D. 2009). Also, an advance awareness of this trait tends to lead to the promotion of
Individual’s growth and productivity. The average person who demonstrates a high Self-Efficacy
believe that challenges are there to be mastered, but in contrast those with a low sense of Self-
Efficacy view complicated assignment as a threat and thus remove themselves from those tasks.
For example, Cain v. Able scenario and the manner in which Cain responded or reacted to the
selection of his brother's tribute instead of his offering. (Self-Esteem and
the Bible. (2024).
(Bandura, A, 1977) outlined that, the development of an individual efficacy
believes are often
interpreted from the influences of four main studies.
1. Performance Outcomes - referring to the Mastering of their
experiences and the positive result
that a person gains by confronting
and mastering the challenges that avail themselves.
2. Vicarious Experiences - Is considered the second important aspect of the efficacy belief
process and it refers to those who acquire experiences from watching other people completing
challenging assignments.
3.
3. Verbal Persuasion - relates to the influential factors of
Self-Efficacy such as encouragement
and discouragement of an
individual's performance while completing a project.
4. Physiological Feedback - focuses on the fact that people often
base their perception of Self-
Efficacy from the bodily sensation
or emotional arousal.
4.
References
Carey, M. P., & Forsyth, A. D. (2009). Self-Efficacy Teaching Tip Sheet. American
Psychological Association.
https://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/education/self-efficacy
Self-Esteem and the Bible. (2024). Foundations.
https://foundations.vision.org/selfesteem-and-
bible-1222
Cambridge Dictionary. (2019, November 27). SELF-EFFICACY | definition in
the
Cambridge English Dictionary. Cambridge.org.
Lopez-Garrido, G. (2023, July 10). Bandura’s self-efficacy theory of
motivation in psychology.
Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/self-efficacy.html
Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from
educational theory to instructional practice.
Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
5.